How to set up a concierge practice - - Medical Economics | Practice Management

ADVERTISEMENT

Medical Economics
How to set up a concierge practice


Medical Economics

 

COVER STORY

How to set up a concierge practice

Jump to:

More and more doctors are looking at this alternative to the managed care rat race. If you're interested, here's what you need to know.

By Wayne J. Guglielmo
Senior Editor

Doc, you realize your office is a lot like Disney World," an unhappy patient quipped to Mark R. Wheeler, an internist in Louisville. "It's a three-hour wait for a 20-second ride."

"That comment spoke volumes about what was going on in my practice," says Wheeler. "I was always behind. My patients weren't happy, and neither were my staff, my family, or me."

Web Poll
click here to vote
(voting deadline 9/4/03)

Some believe that concierge practices are unethical. Do you?

Today, Wheeler is a changed man, calling his partner, internist John Varga, and himself "two of the luckiest physicians on the face of this earth."

The turning point came last September when the two physicians officially opened OneMD—a retainer or concierge-style practice that caps the number of patients at 300 per doctor. In return for a $4,000 annual fee ($6,000 per couple), patients get 24/7 access, reduced in-office waiting time, house calls, an enhanced yearly health exam, and other gold-plated services not generally covered by insurers. About 200 patients to date have enrolled—and the practice is "right on the fringe" of profitability.

"We don't claim to be practicing better medicine," says Wheeler, "but the fact that we can spend more time with our patients means they're going to get better care."

Other doctors feel the same way. Indeed, since retainer-style practices came on the scene in the late 1990s, their number has grown steadily. Florida-based MDVIP—a company that assists doctors in transitioning from traditional to retainer-style practices—has expanded its network in three years from a handful of local offices to 24 practices in seven states, with 40 more practices in the works. "We think there are as many as 2,000 primary care physicians out there who would qualify for this type of arrangement," says former FP Edward E. Goldman, president and co-founder of the company.

Of course, that leaves a lot of physicians who aren't cut out for custom medicine: Perhaps their patients can't (or won't) support it; perhaps they agree with critics who think it's elitist; or perhaps the doctors are motivated for the wrong reasons—by anger at the system or the prospect of a quick buck. Indeed, despite the potential for high earnings in a boutique-style practice (one Florida internal medicine practice reports 575 patients have signed on at $1,500 per patient), the start-up years can be tricky.

To help you decide whether a concierge-style practice is right for you—and start your own if you decide the answer is Yes—we talked to doctors around the country who've made the switch to this new practice environment.

The right motivation is key

Step one, nearly everyone agrees, is to examine your motives.

"Be clear why you want to do it," says Seattle internist Mitchell A. Karton, who together with partner Garrison Bliss started Seattle Medical Associates, a patient-supported retainer-style practice that accepts no third-party fees, in 1997. (The majority of retainer-style practices still bill third parties for covered services.) If it's because you hate the system and want to somehow strike back, think twice. "We never felt we were reacting adversarially against insurers," says Karton. "In fact, we've remained on as many [fee-for-service, PPO, and POS] panels as we can."

Doctors tempted by the lure of big bucks should also reconsider. For one thing, premium practices take time to develop.

"Typically, there's a period after start-up when income goes way down as patients decide whether to stay," says Allison McCarthy, a senior consultant in the northeast office of Corporate Health Group, a national consulting firm. "It often takes a good two years to bring the patient level up to where it should be." At that point, doctors typically do better financially. But in the interim, they are likely to struggle, especially those with high start-up costs, which could range from $100,000 to many times that amount. For this reason, doctors like Massachusetts internist Richard S. Goldman say money is only part of what motivates them.

Last September, Goldman closed a busy internal medicine practice in Framingham to start AccessMD, a concierge practice in Wellesley, closer to Boston. Goldman knows that, as his patient roster expands beyond the 200 patients who've already signed up under the new arrangement, he's likely to be better compensated than he was before. (He charges $2,000 per patient annually, $3,500 for a husband and wife.) But it's the immediate reward of being able "to spend time again with patients" that sustains him. "I haven't been able to spend 45 minutes to an hour with a patient in the last 10 years," he says. "Now I can—and professionally it is so much more satisfying."

That's a common sentiment among the doctors we talked to. "I don't have to apologize to patients anymore," says Seattle internist John N. Kirkpatrick, who helped start a retainer-style practice as part of Virginia Mason Medical Center, a 400-physician practice.

Pomona, NY, internist Charles F. Glassman, who joined the MDVIP network last November and now along with his partner offers concierge services to 500 patients, explains his professional satisfaction this way: "I recently saw a patient who presented with symptoms consistent with a sinus infection. After I examined her and wrote out the necessary prescriptions, I asked, 'Is there anything else?' That phrase was never in my vocabulary before. Truthfully, I didn't want to know. Now I do."

The private vs the franchise route

Follow soul searching with consideration of a more practical question: Should you develop the new practice on your own or go the MDVIP-like route?

The answer, says consultant McCarthy, depends on how "entrepreneurially oriented" a doctor is. Do you like the idea of designing the new practice from the ground up? Or do you want an experienced hand like MDVIP to come in and take charge?

Richard Goldman of AccessMD chose the former option. "I wanted the flexibility of being able to do it my way," he says.

But going it alone meant a hefty up-front investment for new and redesigned office space; an electronic medical record, necessary for enhanced follow-up; outside help to handle tricky legal, practice management, and marketing issues; and other things. A company like MDVIP, or MD2 in Seattle, would have shouldered most of these start-up costs and responsibilities for Goldman. For its help and initial cash outlay, MDVIP charges its network doctors an ongoing service fee—one-third of the $1,500 annual patient retainer, or $500 per patient. For some doctors, like internist Bernard Kaminetsky in Boca Raton, FL, who's been with MDVIP for nearly two years and whose patient roster has climbed to 575 patients, that $500 seems like a bargain. Gross revenues from retainer fees alone now exceed $850,000. He compliments the company for its help in launching his new practice.

But for other physicians, like Richard Goldman, the fee was one reason he decided not to go the franchise route. "It seemed to me, in the long run, I would do better financially on my own," he says.

Base your decision on your access to capital, your willingness to shoulder additional responsibilities, and your need to place your individual stamp on things.

Nine steps to get you started

Doctors who decide to go it alone—often with the help of consultants—should follow these nine steps:

1. Survey your current patients. Is 24/7 Internet access something they'd really like? What about house calls and escorting them to specialist visits?

It's important to find out which services will sell patients on this kind of practice. It's just as important to gauge which services and amenities patients don't care about and won't pay extra for: "Just as most doctors aren't in this for the fluff, most patients aren't, either," says Allison McCarthy. "Sure, if they're paying a $5,000 fee they don't want the office to look junky, but a pretty office isn't what's driving them. What's driving them—especially medically complex patients—is having someone who'll really manage their care."

A survey will also help you assess patient loyalty. Do patients have an emotional attachment to you and the practice? Or are they so disgruntled by how they've been treated in the past they're not likely to follow you, whatever new level of service you promise?

2. Develop a "menu" and fees. Louisville's Mark Wheeler and his partner put together a "total package"—smoking cessation, exercise counseling, weight management, and a comprehensive physical with everything from an exercise stress test to a full battery of labs. They continue to see sick patients, of course, but their orientation is toward preventive medicine, something many insurers pay only lip service to. Then, based on their potential patient population, they calculated what they needed to charge per patient to deliver this level of service.

The menu and fee structure you develop will depend on your patients' needs—and their willingness and ability to pay for a premium-level of care.

3. Make a timetable. Transitioning from a traditional to a concierge practice is labor intensive. A timetable, complete with benchmarks, will keep things on track and help you to maintain continuity.

4. Address legal issues. The key is to work with a good health care attorney—someone familiar with the requirements for structuring retainer-style practices. (For more on these issues, see "Avoid these legal pitfalls".)

5 Create marketing materials. In reaching out to new and current patients, experts say, the trick is to promote a new corporate image—one consistent with the enhanced level of services you're offering. That could mean a new letterhead and logo, a new e-mail address, even a new practice name.

6. Explain the practice to insurers. As a rule, health plans don't prohibit participating physicians from opening retainer-style practices, says Susan Pisano, spokesperson for the American Association of Health Plans. Insurers will still cover contractually obligated office- and hospital-based services and procedures. The concierge fee is for the "extras," like monitoring specialist care if a patient lands in the hospital.

Still, insurers are being cautious. "Many want to look at marketing materials to confirm that what plan members are paying for are extra time and attention, not covered medical services," says McCarthy. Be ready to share whatever materials you have—and to make any reasonable changes that are called for.

7. Send a letter to patients. Explaining your move to current patients may be the single hardest step in your transition to a retainer-style practice. That's why a well-crafted introductory letter is critical—especially if you hope to recruit established patients to your new practice. (Physicians in groups with noncompete clauses in their contracts may not have this option. Their former patients could be off limits, whether they're starting a boutique practice or another traditional one.)

Keep the letter brief, and invite patients to call for more information, experts say. Keep the letter positive, as well. "I showed the first drafts to different people, including my wife and friend," says the Bay State's Richard Goldman. "They both said I had to get past my anger—had to stop blaming the system. They were right. The system wasn't the issue. I simply wanted to get back in touch with medicine the way it used to be."

Of course, even the most upbeat, well-crafted letters won't win over all hearts and minds. Some patients will follow you, others will wish they could, and still others will be angry and let you know about it. Fortunately, most doctors who've made the transition report that outraged patients were in the very small minority.

8. Schedule follow-up meetings. Following the introductory letter, some practices hold one-on-one meetings with patients; others host meet-the-doctor nights. Whatever format you choose, follow-up meetings give you and your staff the chance to talk in greater detail about the transition—and the new premium level of service you're offering.

9. Hire a consultant. Your staff may already be customer-oriented—in which case you're ahead of the game. But too often customer service in medicine "is on par with the motor vehicle department," says Pomona's Charles Glassman. If that's the case in your office, you may need to hire someone who can help staff members transition to a customer-service-oriented practice. "Most staff members can make the change, and welcome it," says McCarthy.

You may also have to re-gear your office systems. At the least, say experts, you need software that will enable you to track the status of your former patients—who's switched to another doctor? who's staying with you?—and to manage the care of your new ones. The second goal is the essence of a retainer-style practice, calling for enhanced level of monitoring and follow-up. "The typical paper chart won't help doctors do that," says McCarthy. "But if they're not ready to go to a full EMR, then I help them identify an intermediate software solution."

Is the growing popularity of concierge medicine about to burst forth into a full-blown trend? Not likely, say observers. It will remain a niche style of practice, right for some doctors and patients and all wrong for others.

And what about the criticism that concierge medicine is elitist? Doctors we spoke to say that some of their patients are wealthy, but most aren't. They're either people with complex medical needs willing to reallocate resources slated for less urgent purposes, or healthy people for whom wellness and prevention are top priorities worth paying for.

Says internist Richard Goldman, who has begun helping other physicians who want to start a concierge practice: "It would be nice to provide this level of care to everyone, but, until the system changes, I think this style of practice is a very viable option for both patients and doctors."

Avoid these legal pitfalls

You don't necessarily sever your ties with third-party payers when you switch to concierge medicine. But handled improperly, those continuing relationships can land you in a mess of legal trouble.

The key to avoiding the ban on balance billing and other pitfalls is "to draw a very bright line between the noncovered concierge services for which you're collecting a fee, and covered services for which you're billing payers," says Michael L. Blau, head of the Health Law Department at McDermott, Will & Emery, in Boston. That's not always easy to do since what insurers will and won't pay for is constantly shifting. But Blau says he's worked effectively with his clients to "wall off" noncovered from covered services.

Concierge practices that continue to bill insurers should also consider setting up "a wholly separate business corporation" alongside their professional corporation, Blau says. The business corporation, which is "not authorized to engage in the practice of medicine," collects the noncovered fees; the professional corporation, which is authorized to practice medicine, "accepts payment in full for covered services from third-party payers, subject to coinsurance, deductibles, and copays."

A "complex financial relationship between the two entities" permits the revenue from one to be shared by the other. (Doctors who go the franchise route circumvent this legal thicket, since the franchise company itself serves as the separate business corporation.)

Doctors must also be careful when terminating relationships with existing patients, especially those with "a continuing, intensive course of treatment," says Blau. He advises meeting with such patients to discuss their options before sending an announcement letter. "If doctors do this, there shouldn't be any continuity of care or patient abandonment issues," he says.

 

The AMA's boutique care guidelines

In June, the AMA issued ethical standards to guide doctors interested in starting a retainer-style practice. Among those standards are:

Both parties must agree to—and be clear about—the terms of the relationship. Patients who wish to opt out should be able to do so without undue hassles or financial penalties.

Retainer-style practices shouldn't be marketed as providing better diagnostic and therapeutic services.

Doctors must help transfer—at no charge—nonparticipating patients to others. If no others are available, a doctor "may be ethically obligated to continue caring for such patients."

Doctors must be honest in billing third-party payers.

Starting a retainer-style practice doesn't exempt physicians from caring for those in need, especially those in need of urgent care.

For a copy of the AMA's guidelines for concierge practices, contact the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Assn., 515 N. State Street, Chicago, IL 60610; Tel: 312-464-4823; Fax: 312-464-4799; E-mail: ceja@ama-assn.org

 



Wayne Guglielmo. How to set up a concierge practice. Medical Economics Aug. 22, 2003;80:64.

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments from our readers
 Posted Jun 18 2008 06:11PM
I was recently abandoned by my physician of 15 years because the group he is with decided to switch over to this form of elitist healthcare. In this case, the greedy third party outsider that brought this all about is MDVIP. If I wanted to continue on with my physician, I would have to sign a contract and pay MDVIP $1,500.00 per year simply to have access to my doctor. My primary insurance company would still be forced to pay for all office visits, lab tests and any in-house procedures. In retrospect, I never needed a third party outsider to get quality care from my physician and I?m not about to line the pockets of some greed driven outsider who has absolutely no interest in my well being. This concept is very unethical and patients are the real losers under this particular business model. Medicare and all insurance companies should refuse reimbursing physicians who adopt this approach to patient care.
 Posted Sep 18 2008 12:29PM
I'd advise patients to RUN away from these kinds of practices. Statements from the doctors like, "I could never spend an hour with a patient before" omit the implied next clause, "and still get filthy rich". Medicine without professionalism and ethics is wrong and dangerous.
 Posted Sep 23 2008 01:47PM
Is it ethical to for a physician to keep a patient waiting for 2 hours only to rush through an appt in 7 minutes, scared to ask the question, "Is there anything else"? As far as filthy rich...I would hardly call primary care physicians filthy rich. My husband, a primary care doc, decreased his salary $10k per year in a traditional practice as patient volume increased and practice overhead spiraled out of control. When he left traditional prinary care he was making $80,000/year with $200,000 in med school debt. Concierge medicine offers doctors who are facing leaving medicine completely an option. Many such practices charge $60-$100/month and charge nothing more to the patient and opt out of insurance. Often patients go to high deductible insurance plans and actually save money and have better medical care. Most concierge doctors make the average primary care income but are doing it with happier patients. I advise patients to give up the $4 latte per day and invest in quality healthcare. RUN, don't walk, to a doctor willing and able to ask..."Is there anything else?"
 Posted Nov 12 2008 12:07AM
I am surprised By Dr. Grungle's comments. It is obvious he does not understand that primary physicians do not get "filthy rich" in this direct practice model. Unethical? The idea that a primary care physician has a patient base of anywhere from 2000 to 5000 patients and has to compy to the directives of non-medical personnel in their delivery of sickness based medical care to patients seems alot more unethical than the idea of allowing more time to accomplish wellness and preventative care to patients. I do not have this kind of practice but this sure makes sense to me. Perhaps this model may encourage medical students to go into primary care medicine. Perhaps health care costs in this country would decline as more and more people are taken care of from a truly preventative approach. This makes sense to me.
 Posted Nov 21 2008 08:12PM
This is a nonprofessional approch and a sot of fleecing the patients.Sounds more like a business and doctors resorting to this kind of practice seem to be shopkeepers rather than doctors.Moreover a doctor covers only a few rich and elite type of patients in this sort of practice.
 Posted Jan 30 2009 09:01PM
Do you really still think Internist and family doctors are "raking it in"? They are trying to see more patients in in one day than ever before just to pay their overhead expenses. When they have hours of phone calls to make they don't charge the patient the way an attorney gets to charge for their time. A true preventitive care doctor wants to spend real time with the patient and not feel they have to get in so many patients just to pay their malpractice insurance. A plumber or dentist can charge what they think their time is worth-why not a hard working doctor?Look more carefully at the Insurance companies rather than putting the unfair judgement on the doctors.
 Posted Feb 11 2009 07:58PM
To the woman who's husband is "only" making $80K a year with $200K medical debt - give me a break. There are numerous states that will repay medical debt for service to underserved areas, and your husband chose not to go. Most people in this economy would leap at the chance to make $80,000 a year. I love this "barely surviving" argument from doctors, vs. the numbers put on what these folks are making right into practice. It's about choices, folks, and if you make a choice to only serve people that can pay for the preventative care at high dollar amounts, obviously you'll make more, and work less. Nothing wrong with greed or to work less for more money - but for crimeny's sake, don't expect patients to have sympathy that you're "barely making it" at 80K a year and have the guts to call a spade a spade.
 Posted Feb 20 2009 01:47PM
Jen: I don't believe you understand. First let me put forth the definition of greed: desire to acquire more than one needs or deserves / especially when this denies the same goods to others. Therefore greed is wrong. But I don't see greed as an issue. After an MD spends 10 years in training, spends hundreds of thousands of dollars, sacrificing most semblances of life during that time ... he has earned, or deserves something. To say he is anything other than barely making it at $80k for the first 10 years or so is an exaggeration. Because he doesn't join the army / some state program for 8 years does not negate this. I'm sure there are plenty of people who would jump at an $80k salary - but they don't chose to earn it by going to school for 10 years and spending hundreds of thousands. The point is moot. The medical field is losing physicians all the time due to people like you in congress who feel a doctor should be satisfied with his career path making $80k. The physicians decide it isn't so great and get out, or go concierge/direct care medicine. You try taking the job of a physician in a 5000 patient practice, and tell me how appreciated you feel making $80k.
 Posted Jun 07 2009 02:33PM
You are all missing the point! It's about physicians losing control over the past decades since the inception of HMO medicine and being dictated to by third parties. It's America folks and everyone has the right to earn as much money as they believe makes them fulfilled. The concierge physician wants to take back control of his/her practice, life and earning potential. If seeing 10 patients a day while earning the same dollar value is fulfilling to that physician then that is the appropriate type of practice. If seeing 45 Pts./day is a physicians idea of a balanced practice then more power to that physician. After 17 years I closed my practice and am about to reopen as a concierge practice. It has nothing to with $$ but rather I want control of how I will practice in the future. I want a relationship with my patients that states "I am here for you" 24/7 instead of shuffling them through a bunch of partners as the weekly call schedule dictates. I empathize with the thought this represents medicine for the haves while potentially isolating the have not's but the current system has failed and our Government elects to not fix the multi-leveled nightmare. It's about control and I want to take my practice and life back!!
 Posted Jun 13 2009 10:18PM
You may want to just consider joining an existing business like EliteHealth or SignatureMD as the cost to set a practice up correctly is very high.
Read More Comments
post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Practice ToolsPractice Tools
Coding Counselor
Coding Counselor

Simple and accurate ICD-9 code search. Start Here

Patient Education
Patient Education

Print customized patient education handouts. Start Here

Surgical Video Center
Surgical Video Center

On-demand surgery demos and presentations. Start Here

ADVERTISEMENT



Source: Medical Economics,
Click here