How to avoid malpractice suits - What you don't do to head off malpractice claims can be as critical as what you do. - Medical Economics | Practice Management

ADVERTISEMENT

Medical Economics
How to avoid malpractice suits
What you don't do to head off malpractice claims can be as critical as what you do.


Medical Economics


Key iconKey Points

  • If you document your reasoning for avoiding an established treatment in a particular case, you will sidestep allegations you breached the standard of care.
  • It's very easy to take verbal swings at your colleagues. Avoid the temptation.
  • Documentation before there is a legal problem is considered an explanation. Documentation addressed after there is a legal problem is considered an excuse.

Nothing's worse than having the first appointment of your day interrupted by an unpleasant surprise. Instead of the child who is running a fever or the father who's concerned about his blood pressure, you are faced with a sheriff serving a summons. Instead of helping a patient learn what she can do to feel better, you are scrambling for ways to make yourself feel better. Not good.


Jeffrey Segal, MD
In 2007 alone, nearly 11,500 malpractice claims were paid in the United States, and the average cost of defending a claim today—win or lose—hovers around $30,000, according to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. But preventive care in the legal world works much the same way as in medicine. Try adopting some common-sense methods, an "eat-right-and-don't-smoke" model of addressing the legal system. This will keep lawyers out of your office and out of your life.

Think of it this way: The better care you take of yourself legally means the greater your chances of swearing off lawyers forever—the same way that taking care of your body may well mean avoiding costly and intensive medical interventions.

What follows are the guidelines I've gathered from the trenches to help you stay malpractice-suit-free:

Use your cell phone to return pages from your answering service.

People inclined to sue often allege that the doctor did not call back in a timely fashion or did not call at all. If you call from a land line, there is no record of your call being made. Call from a cell phone and a record is created. Won't patients abuse the privilege and call you directly on your cell? I've found this is generally not the case.

Now that you've called the patient back, document what was said.

It's too easy to give advice and ignore the paper trail. If you use an electronic health record, login and record. If you have access to a call-in transcription service, use it. If not, create a separate voice mailbox on your office phone to be used for transcription of after-hours messages.

Guarantee that patients will receive lab and radiology results in a specified time period or their office visit is free.

That's right. If you tell all patients they will hear from you regarding their results, they will never assume that no news is good news. This is a frequent source of litigation, particularly when tests reveal something as serious as cancer. The doctor often assumes the staff sent information to the patient. The patient assumes that not hearing from the doctor is good news. Tie your office manager's bonus to how frequently such refunds are tendered, and you will find the information gets transferred with nearly 100 percent accuracy.

Document what you did not do.

Although it sounds counterintuitive, there are times it makes eminent sense to keep a record of what was not done. Sometimes, there is extensive literature explaining the merits of following a particular algorithm for treating a given condition, but for a variety of reasons, you might choose to forgo such treatments. The default assumption by a plaintiff's attorney will be that "If it was not documented, you were unaware of such standards for treatment and you didn't even think about it." But if you document your reasoning for avoiding such an established treatment—because in your judgment, in this particular case, the risks outweighed the benefits—you will sidestep any allegation that you breached the standard of care. It takes two minutes to document. If you address it upfront, it's an explanation. If you address it after the fact, it's an excuse.


ADVERTISEMENT

Comments from our readers
 Posted 2009-04-17 18:05:30.0
I must say that I am impressed with Dr. Segal's comments in this article. I am a New York medical malpractice plaintiff's attorney and agree with all of his comments. I'll bet you never expected a plaintiff's medical malpractice attorney to agree with a neurosurgeon on the issue of medical negligence. It's true. Regarding the last comment: Never alter your records; you are 100% correct. To see what happened in a deposition I recently handled where the surgeon altered his records and never informed his attorney, take a look at this brief educational video, http://nymedicalmalpracticevideoblog.com/?p=317 My hat is off to you for giving useful and practical advice to your colleagues.
 Posted 2009-04-18 01:29:39.0
In after hours or week ends it helps to record a brief note of conversation with a "risky" patient. One of my pedritician friend won his malpractice law suit based on that brief note (produced in the court 16 months later)
Read More Comments
post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Practice ToolsPractice Tools
Coding Counselor
Coding Counselor

Simple and accurate ICD-9 code search. Start Here

Patient Education
Patient Education

Print customized patient education handouts. Start Here

Surgical Video Center
Surgical Video Center

On-demand surgery demos and presentations. Start Here

ADVERTISEMENT



Source: Medical Economics,
Click here