• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    This is why we need to accelerate value-based care

    Much like the Accountable Care Act (ACA) debate in 2010, the current political debate over repealing and replacing the ACA is focused on coverage and cost. Aligning provider and payer incentives to reward value-based health care is key to addressing the escalating costs facing the healthcare industry and nation. We urge policymakers to accelerate value-based care by rewarding clinical quality and cost-efficiency in the U.S. healthcare system in order to reduce costs and drive innovation and care delivery transformation.

     

    FURTHER READING: Here's the answer to fixing healthcare

     

    While President Trump and Congress consider plans to transform healthcare, we believe they don't have to look far for sensible models to control costs and improve quality. The ACA includes programs that drive value-based care, where doctors and hospitals profit from good outcomes rather than volume. This idea of value-based care predates the ACA in alternative payment models like bundled payments and global fees.

    The premise behind bundled payments and global fees is to encapsulate a suite of procedures and services from one episode of care (like a knee replacement) into one fixed fee. These changes evolved as innovative insurance companies and providers realized that standardized protocols that control cost and optimize outcomes could be paid through a single reimbursement.

    Maternity care stands out as an early adopter and great example of sensible payment reform from which we can learn. Maternity care providers long ago embraced payment mechanisms that value quality over volume. Their embrace of technology to positively impact care, manage risk and control cost are exemplary. The architects of the new “replacement” healthcare plan should study how maternity care is evolving to see how other service sectors can follow suit to make affordable care a reality.

     

    TRENDING ON OUR SITE: Is healthcare a collective right or individual privilege?

     

    For more than 30 years across the United States, maternity care providers have received a flat fee from insurance companies or Medicaid for prenatal services (excluding hospitalization costs) for a routine pregnancy and delivery. This lump sum payment, known as a global fee, motivates maternity care providers to better manage costs while engaging patients so healthy mothers deliver healthy babies. Prenatal global fees are one of the earliest examples of value-based care.

    Next: We can learn from these experiences

    Juan Pablo Segura
    Co-founder and president of Babyscripts.
    Kelly Leggett, MD
    Dr. Leggett is a practicing OB-GYN and the clinical transformation officer for Cone Health.

    2 Comments

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • Anonymous
      Agree with Nesondo... Value based payments are absolutely wrong as a mode of reimbursement. Too many variables - many of which are beyond the control of physcians/caregivers. Also "value" metrics necessitate documentation which has been proven to diminish "value" by taking docs from the bedside to the computer, an inherently "invaluable" manner of practicing medicine. Perhaps a better way to improve actual health would be quit making Americans sick. Let food stamps purchase ONLY fruits and vegetables, weight check-ins for those on entitlements (a basal welfare check and subtract from it if weight goals not attained), smoking subtractions. Other common-sense ideas to actually improve HEALTH. We are hostage to a narrative that health care APPEARS poor in the US whereas in reality, we know HEALTH CARE here is actually the best in the world. Too many noncompliant, exercise-phobic patients skew our outcomes??? Value based payments will simply exacerbate the problem.
    • [email protected]
      OB lends itself to this kind of billing. A single problem with a standard progression that resolves in 9 months. Compare that to diabetes. A lifelong problem that improves and worsens based on a stuttering progression that is HIGHLY correlated to patient compliance. Most chronic diseases do not easily fall into a "value based" billing model. Could you explain how pelvic inflammatory disease, or endometriosis could easily be billed based on "value"?

    Latest Tweets Follow

    Poll