• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Why is there a problem with upcoding and overbilling?

    Problems with physician overcoding and overbilling persists, despite increased focus on the cost of healthcare and scrutiny by federal regulators, according to a new report by ProPublica, which analyzed CMS data between 2012 to 2015 on services provided by and payments made to providers under Medicare’s Part B program in 2015.

    In the study, ProPublica analyzed provider billing patterns for standard office visits in Medicare and found more than 490,000 providers billed the program for standard office visits for at least 11 patients in 2015. Of those, more than 1,250 providers billed for every office visit using the 99215 code, which is only to be used for visits that involve more intense examination and often consumes more time. Additionally, 1,825 health professionals billed Medicare for the most expensive type of office visits for established patients almost 90 percent of the time in 2015.


    FURTHER READING: Top 10 most in demand metros for physicians


    Tom Davis, MD, a primary care physician for more than three decades in St. Louis, Mo., says the problem is severe, driven by employer compensation formulae that pay clinicians based on relative value units (RVUs). Clinicians often worry that data-based compensation adjustments are going to decrease their pay and thus must be offset by more aggressive coding.

    “As long as compensation is based on RVUs, overcoding is going to persist,” Davis says. “Transitioning from traditional fee-for-service Medicare to Medicare Advantage paid through a shared-risk compensation formula would go a long way toward addressing overbilling. Clinicians would be paid on the value of the care they provide rather than fairly arbitrary definitions of levels of service.”

    Until the payment system changes, he adds, overbilling is not going to significantly change—the clinicians will just have to deal with one more issue that increases their stress and risk of burnout.

    Maxine Lewis, CPC, a member of the National Society of Healthcare Business Consultants in Reston, Va., says reimbursement is diminishing and the only way to increase it is to either be an expert in value-based care or upcode the services.

    “Providers can document better with the use of an EHR and the EHR can also suggest the level of service to bill using the documentation,” she says. “Mistakes are being made because providers are seeing more patients per hour and sometimes are in a hurry to check the proper LOS. Others believe since they have documented with the help of the EHR, that they have noted a higher level.”

    David Zetter, a healthcare consultant and founder of Zetter Healthcare in Mechanicsburg, Penn., believes most practices do not know whether they are billing, coding and documenting correctly as most have never had a real billing, coding, clinical documentation review, so they were set up to fail coming out of residency and fellowship.

    “They really need to take control and ownership of how they are documenting their services and portraying their patients to the payers,” he says. “In order to do this, they need to understand how they should be documenting more thoroughly and appropriately billing the correct codes for the patient being seen and the services being rendered.”

    Next: Fixing the problem

    Keith Loria
    Keith Loria is a contributing writer to Medical Economics.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available

    Latest Tweets Follow