23% of medical practices considering EHR switch, survey reveals
A new survey of nearly 17,000 active electronic health records (EHR) system users found that about 23% of currently implemented physician practices are frustrated enough to consider switching vendors.
Dissatisfied EHR users reported problems interfacing with other software, overly complex connectivity and networking schemes, and concerns related to integration with mobile devices, according to a survey from Black Book Market Research.
Federal initiatives to increase EHR adoption rates have been amped up over the past few years, particularly since the passage of the 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Since then, several efforts to increase EHR adoption have emerged, including attaching payment incentives to EHR implementation.
Still, physicians have frequently complained about several aspects of the federal government's "meaningful use" incentive program. The American Medical Association, for example, recently outlined five problems it sees with meaningful use, including that the program is too stringent, takes a one-size-fits-all approach and does nothing to address usability concerns associated with EHR systems.
Participants in the Black Book survey would likely agree with many of those assessments. The specialties expressing the highest rates of discontent with their EHRs were nephrology (88%), urology (85%) and ophthalmology (80%).
Conversely, the specialties with the highest rates of EHR satisfaction were internal medicine (89%), family practice (85%), general practice (82%) and pediatrics (80%). That may be because most EHRs are designed with that customer base in mind; a recent study showed that family physicians outpaced all other specialties on EHR adoption.
Survey participants most frequently cited the following criteria as "must-haves" for their EHR solutions:
data integration and network sharing;
adoption of mobile devices;
health information exchange support and connectivity; and
perfected interfaces with lab, pharmacy, radiology, medical billing partners, and others.
MORE ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE
As it looks increasingly likely that Congress won't reach a deal this week to head off broad cuts to federal programs known as sequestration, physicians should begin preparing themselves for across-the-board 2% cuts to Medicare reimbursement.
More than 40 speciality physician groups have joined the Association of American Medical Colleges in an advertising campaign urging Congress to fight cuts to federal funding that supports doctor training at America’s teaching hospitals.
Here is Medical Economics’ completely subjective list of 20 insightful, interesting, and active family doctors on Twitter, in no particular order.
The American Academy of Family Physicians has released five new things to avoid as part of the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely campaign, adding to the existing list of five tests, medical procedures, or treatments that have been deemed to possibly do more harm than good.
Many physicians may not be aware of how their clothing choices affects patients' perceptions of their professionalism or competence.
Researchers have developed a primary care task list that describes patient visits to ambulatory clinics that physicians can use as a workflow evaluation tool.
Public health experts at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research say the current gun policy dialogue needs more physician involvement, according to a new paper published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
The nation's looming shortage of primary care physicians has been well-documented and much-debated, but what about a shortage of physician assistants in primary care?