• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Shared decision making unites physicians, patients

    It’s been a long time since patients universally viewed their physicians as infallible and having the sole say in medical decisions.

    The availability of medical information online, news of medical errors and malpractice and the emphasis on controlling healthcare costs have led to more patient involvement in medical decisions. For physicians, the growth in shared decision making has been driven by evidence that it leads to better care and a push by the medical establishment.

    Though it’s getting more attention now, shared decision making is not new. In 1982, a presidential commission declared that practicing ethical medicine required giving patients the necessary information to form their own opinions and have those opinions taken into account in the ultimate treatment decision.

    Yet in the 34 years since, study after study has found that shared decision making is not always used when it should be and, when it is employed, is often done imperfectly and unevenly. “How Patient-Centered are Medical Decisions?”, a study published in JAMA in 2013, asked patients to describe the decision-making process for 10 common medical decisions, including six most often made in primary care.

    Respondents reported much more discussion of the pros than the cons of tests or treatments, although discussions about surgical procedures tended to be more balanced than those concerning medications to reduce cardiac risks and cancer screening. Decisions about back or knee replacement surgery generated the most patient-centered discussions; breast and prostate cancer screening the least. 

    “Discussions about these common tests, medications, and procedures . . . do not reflect a high level of shared decision making, particularly for five decisions most often made in primary care,” the authors concluded. 

    Perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising that shared decision making isn’t used more widely. It requires additional time and effort on the part of everyone involved, educating patients in complicated matters and a shift in the traditional relationship between patients and physicians.

    1 Comment

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • [email protected]
      Your emotions toward your essayhelpdeal.co.uk doctor aren't unethical or irregular. There are a wide range of sorts of adoration and you have a needy affection for him since he has shown a caring affection towards you via nurturing your wellbeing needs. Numerous years back, I felt an affection for a specialist who had been incredibly kind to me - it's human instinct to react to somebody who has your best advantages as a primary concern and places this energetically for your benefit. The reason you don't feel along these lines about different doctors is, presumably, on the grounds that they haven't demonstrated the profundity of minding your neurologist has. You're getting yourself into an 'annoyed mode' over something you can do nothing about - you don't hold the keys to the future so should acknowledge whatever happens yet it's imperative to place things into perpective and not stress over what tomorrow may bring ...

    Latest Tweets Follow