Bundled payments: Good in theory but difficult to implement
Bundled payments may sound good in theory, but the reality is falling short of expectations so far.
A report from the RAND Corp., a nonprofit global policy institute, indicates some cause for concern for those organizations indicating interest in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) most recent bundled payments initiatives.
The RAND study, published in the November issue of the journal Health Affairs, evaluated the first 3 years of the Prometheus bundled payment pilot project conducted by the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute. So far, no bundled payments have been made and no payment contracts for bundled payments have been executed in any of the three participating communities.
“There is a tremendous amount of interest in this type of payment reform, but we found that transferring it into practice is extremely difficult,” says lead author Peter Hussey, a RAND policy researcher.
Bundled payments are designed to encourage coordination of care and improved communication among healthcare providers, who all share a set fee for comprehensive treatment of a procedure or disease. The concept often is touted as a way to drive down inefficiencies and unnecessary care associated with the traditional fee-for-service payment model.
The three test sites—Crozer Keystone Health System-Independence Blue Cross in Pennsylvania, Employers’ Coalition on Health in Illinois, and Priority Health-Spectrum Health in Michigan—encountered difficulties deciding which health problems should be covered by bundled payments and what information physicians needed to improve the quality of care. In addition, all three found that many doctors were reluctant to adopt cost-cutting measures for fear they would impair the care provided. Each organization independently defined its payment structure, contracted with physicians and other providers, and established its own quality measures.
The study found that some significant improvements had been made despite the challenges in implementing bundled payments. Pilot participants had taken steps toward redesigning care and increasing provider awareness of ways they can control costs and improve care.
MORE ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE
More than half of all office-based physicians now use e-prescribing, up from fewer than 10% just 3 years ago, according to statistics from the nation’s largest health information network. Massachusetts had the highest e-prescribing usage rate. Find out how your state ranks.
The Food and Drug Administration is seeking input from the medical community on a recently released draft document to be used to train providers who prescribe opioids. The American Academy of Family Physicians and other groups strongly oppose mandatory continuing medical education for physicians who prescribe controlled substances.
You might want to add a few more chairs in your waiting room. Just weeks after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced screenings for depression and alcohol abuse free of charge to Medicare patients, it now has added similar coverage for preventive services to reduce cardiovascular disease. Find out what the Medicare policy specifies primary care providers should do during those once-a-year visits.
Physicians who are concerned about the antitrust implications of accountable care organizations may be able to find a safe harbor under new rules announced recently by government agencies. The guidance is designed to help healthcare providers form ACOs, balancing the anticompetitive effects of joining together to provide care against the efficiencies created by collaboration.
Over the next few years, a much higher percentage of Americans will be covered by Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, according to a new study. Find out how many more primary care doctors will be required to care for them and what the government must do to persuade more physicians to participate in the program.