• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    To curb opioid abuse, new technologies must be embraced

     

    EPCS prescribing rates also vary greatly among states. New York, which has mandated EPCS since March 2016, has 72% of its prescribers EPCS-enabled and sent almost 92% of its controlled substance prescriptions electronically in 2016. By contrast, Minnesota, which has a mandate but no enforcement provision, has much lower EPCS adoption: in 2016 just 14% of prescribers were EPCS-enabled and less than 20% of the controlled substance prescriptions were sent electronically.

     

    POPULAR ON OUR SITE: Physicians, not the government, should lead the fight against opioids

     

    New York, which was the first state to implement penalties for noncompliance, provides a good example of how a combination of legislative requirements and technology can help reduce opioid-prescription rates. Since initiating its I-STOP program, the number of painkillers prescribed to New York City residents has declined 12%.

    One likely reason for the overall slow adoption of EPCS nationwide is the complex, time-consuming process for supplemental DEA registration and credentialing. Nevertheless, in states like New York that penalize prescribers for non-use, physicians and health systems are more motivated to invest the time and money to comply with the requirements. In states that lack mandates and penalties, prescribers are more likely to not adopt EPCS and continue with paper despite transmitting the great majority of their legend drugs electronically.

    Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs

    State controlled PDMPs increase prescriber visibility into patient drug histories through the collection and analysis of prescribing and dispensing data. If the data is made available and user friendly at the point of care, prescribers would be better equipped to assess risk and have meaningful conversations with patients.

    Unfortunately, even when PDMP technology is available, prescribers don’t always consult these databases because the process can be onerous. Typically, PDMP data is not integrated into electronic health record ((EHR) workflows so a physician must leave the system, access PDMP data with a separate log-in ID and then return back to the EHR.

    Next: "The opioid epidemic is exacting a lethal toll on the country"

    Tom Sullivan, MD
    Tom Sullivan, MD, is a board-certified cardiologist and internal medicine specialist with over 40 years of clinical practice. He is ...

    2 Comments

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • [email protected]
      Dr Sullivan, very noble and well stated. Really though, you advocate another burden for those of us in the trenches. If you would like to cover the cost of implementation and training, then maybe you have some traction. Why not prosecute the very few "bad prescribers", pull their license, fines, and even prison terms. The vast number of us are good stewards of our prescribing privileges, law abiding, and should not be hampered with more restrictions, debts, and threats. Go get the bad guys and leave the good guys alone please. You regulators are burning us out of primary care Dr Bob
    • Anonymous
      Hmmmmm.... The "chief strategy officer of e-prescribing and medication management solutions provider DrFirst" recommends we use (and pay for in $$ and time) e-prescribing to stop the opioid crisis? Imagine that. I'm sure his company can successfully contribute to state level politicians in a rent seeking move to require this.

    Latest Tweets Follow

    Poll