• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Corporate medicine use doctors as pawns

    Editor's Note: Welcome to Medical Economics' blog section which features contributions from members of the medical community. These blogs are an opportunity for bloggers to engage with readers about a topic that is top of mind, whether it is practice management, experiences with patients, the industry, medicine in general, or healthcare reform. The series continues with this blog by Ken Fisher, MD, who is an internist/nephrologist in Kalamazoo, Michigan, a teacher, author ("Understanding Healthcare: A Historical Perspective") and co-founder of Michigan Chapter Free Market Medicine Association. The views expressed in these blogs are those of their respective contributors and do not represent the views of Medical Economics or UBM Medica.



    What is the corporate view of physicians, and in particular, hospital employed physicians? A revealing report from a recent joint meeting of the American Medical Association (AMA) with hospital CEOs was published in Health Affairs Blog, March 28, 2017, titled, Physician Burnout Is A Public Health Crisis: A Message To Our Fellow Healthcare CEOs.    


    Further reading: Is work-life balance a reality for physicians?


    The group recognized that physician wellbeing is vital to the delivery of good cost-efficient care, which is certainly a true statement. As such, they voiced concern that physician mental health is diminishing and that physician burnout is increasing, as reported in recent studies. They stated that this is becoming a national healthcare crisis and wished to address the causes to fix the problem.Ken Fisher, MD

    Several issues, which are causing increasing rates of burnout far greater than in other professions, were discussed. The CEOs considered a critical issue to be the loss of control over physicians’ practice of medicine. This is truly astonishing, as hospitals have been voraciously buying physician practices and making them part of their corporate structure, resulting in physicians no longer having the final word on their conditions of practice. 

    Even more damning is that hospitals and the AMA have favored and supported the major reasons for physicians accepting these buyouts: ill-conceived federal policies.  Beginning with the HITECH Act (part of the 2009 stimulus package), doctors and hospitals were required to use poorly designed, excessively expensive, extremely time-consuming, “certified” electronic health records (EHRs). The expense of just this program has forced many physicians to give up their small business and become hospital employees. This law has also caused financial difficulty for smaller hospitals.  


    Popular on our site: Can the looming physician shortage be stopped?


    Additionally, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) have added additional bureaucratic demands on physician time and effort, greatly diminishing direct patient contact. These federal actions were supported and even encouraged by the AMA and large hospital systems. This has led to an impersonal time restricted and demeaning style of medicine for most, especially self-employed physicians.

    Next: Burnout solution is not through hospitals, AMA

    Ken Fisher, MD
    Kenneth A. Fisher, M.D. Nephrologist, and author, latest book, Understanding Healthcare: A Historical Perspective", available ...


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • Anonymous
      You know you're too close for comfort to the truth when the Medical Economics Efitor feels the need to put a disclaimer at the beginning. We have the same problem with the AOA as you do with the AMA. And I recently attended the House of Delegates for the Mich Osteopathic Assn. They've changed procedures so much that busy practicing doctors really are no long given an opportunity to debate resolutions. So , please, editors, read these comments and don't for one moment think that The AMA/AOA and associated organizations reflect the views of real doctors.
    • Anonymous
      I basically agree---plus all the other organizations that charge such a high membership fee---ie. ACOG, Internal med. and so forth. Any real achievable suggestions? Hospitals put hamburger flippers over the office and then wonder why less gets done and doctors leave. All the fine talk is useless unless you really mean it--ie. the patient comes first, work as a team, respect your coworkers. Then it all comes down to numbers and they cannot see why they are so bad. Hope it works for you.

    Latest Tweets Follow